Skip to content
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Notes
    • Moot References
    • Presentation Database
  • BLOGS
    • Case Comments
    • BOOK REVIEWS
  • Submit Articles
    • Experiences
    • Submission Rules
    • Writer Registration
    • Tip the Writer
      • Write With “Thelawmatics”
  • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Activities
      • The_Lawmatics Events
      • WEBINAR
        • FORENSIC SCIENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
      • PM CARES Fund
      • Polls
        • Student’s Opinion
      • Gallery
    • Law Entrance at Panjab University, Chandigarh
    • LLB Previous Year Papers.
    • Immigration
    • Alumni/Student Registration
    • Quiz

Latest Post

What was Mandal Report? Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors. A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post

Circumstantial evidence & The last-seen theory are crucial aspects of Criminal Jurisprudence, Supreme Court: Detailed Analysis of Judgment in Raja Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh

February 9, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post Top Post Tr1

Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC- Law Points in Brief

February 8, 2025
Post

What was Mandal Report?

November 11, 2025
Article Post

Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors.

October 13, 2025
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Post

Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence

September 21, 2025
Post

Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference

September 5, 2025
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Trending
Supreme Court Stay on Aravallis Judgment
theLegalPoint News/Facts
Supreme Court Stay on Aravallis Judgment
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Article
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Article Opinion
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
Experience
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
Article
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Article Opinion Tr1
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Article Post Top Post Tr1
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
Article Post Tr1
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
theLegalPoint News/Facts

Supreme Court Stay on Aravallis Judgment

January 1, 2026

Balancing Ecology, Law & Development

Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025

Justice R.M. Sahai 744. The aspect next to be considered is whether clause (4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations? In other words, the question is whether any…

Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025

Justice R.M. Sahai 743. The question then arises whether clause (4) of Article 16 is exhaustive of the topic of reservations in favour of backward classes. Before we answer this…

Article

Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025

Justice R.M. Sahai 741. In Balaji (AIR 1963 Supreme Court 649) it was held – “there is no doubt that Article 15(4) has to be read as a proviso or…

Article

Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025

Justice R.M. Sahai 738. A question is raised whether an executive order made in terms of Article 16(4) is effective and enforceable by itself or whether it is necessary that…

Article

Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025

Justice R.M. Sahai 735. Sri K. K. Venugopal, learned counsel for the petitioner in writ petition No. 930 of 1990 submits that the “provision” contemplated by clause (4) of Article…

Article

The Framing of Article 16-Debates in the Constituent Assembly

December 20, 2025

685. Draft Article 10 corresponds to Article 16. The debate in the Constituent Assembly on draft Article 10 and particularly Cl. (3), thereof (corresponding to Cl. (4) of Article 16)…

Article

The Second Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission)

December 19, 2025

655. By an Order made by the President of India, in the year 1979, under Article 340 of the Constitution, a Backward Class Commission was appointed to investigate the conditions…

Article

The First and Second Backward Classes Commissions

December 19, 2025

The First Backward Classes Commission (Kalelkar Commission) : 652. The proceedings of the Constituent Assembly on draft Article (10) disclose a persistent and strident demand from certain sections of the…

Article

Part XVI of the Constitution: Special Provisions relating to certain Classes

December 19, 2025

647. Part XVI of the Constitution contains “special provisions relating to certain classes”. The “classes” for which special provisions are made are, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and the Anglo-Indian Community.…

Posts pagination

1 2 … 174
Quiz

Do you know?

In which of the following case the Supreme Court declared section 66A of IT Act as unconstitutional?

HTML
Search

"Publish your posts with thelawmatics for wide promotion without any hassel"


Publish Your Post


Recent Posts
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
Recent Experiences
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 9, 2020
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 7, 2020
  • Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    July 3, 2020
Recent Comments
  • Aniruddha on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Virat Sagar on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Google on From Surat Court to Supreme Court- Timeline of Rahul Gandhi’s Case for Stay on Conviction
Archives

All Lists

You missed

theLegalPoint News/Facts

Supreme Court Stay on Aravallis Judgment

January 1, 2026
Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

Copyright by @ Pfriend862 | TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy for thelawmatics.in
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS
  • Writer’s terms and conditions
  • Writer Registration
  • Contact Us
  • About Us