Skip to content
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Notes
    • Moot References
    • Presentation Database
  • BLOGS
    • Case Comments
    • BOOK REVIEWS
  • Submit Articles
    • Experiences
    • Submission Rules
    • Writer Registration
    • Tip the Writer
      • Write With “Thelawmatics”
  • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Activities
      • The_Lawmatics Events
      • WEBINAR
        • FORENSIC SCIENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
      • PM CARES Fund
      • Polls
        • Student’s Opinion
      • Gallery
    • Law Entrance at Panjab University, Chandigarh
    • LLB Previous Year Papers.
    • Immigration
    • Alumni/Student Registration
    • Quiz

Latest Post

What was Mandal Report? Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors. A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post

Circumstantial evidence & The last-seen theory are crucial aspects of Criminal Jurisprudence, Supreme Court: Detailed Analysis of Judgment in Raja Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh

February 9, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post Top Post Tr1

Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC- Law Points in Brief

February 8, 2025
Post

What was Mandal Report?

November 11, 2025
Article Post

Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors.

October 13, 2025
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Post

Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence

September 21, 2025
Post

Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference

September 5, 2025
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Trending
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Article
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Article Opinion
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
Experience
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
Article
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Article Opinion Tr1
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Article Post Top Post Tr1
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
Article Post Tr1
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
Article

The Rule of Promissory Estoppel in Public Law

March 3, 2023

Meaning Professor H.W.R. Wade in Administrative Law, 5th edition, at page 232 observes that the basic principle of estoppel is that a person who by some statement or representation of…

Article Post

The concept of the living wage

March 2, 2023

The concept of the living wage which has influenced the fixation of wages, statutorily or otherwise, in all economically advanced countries is an old and well- established one, but most…

Article

Test Identification Parade- The timeline of SC’s Observations

March 2, 2023

The meaning and object of Test Identification Parade Identification parades have been in common use for a very long time, for the object of placing a suspect in a line…

Article Case Comments

Express Newspaper Pvt. Ltd. V. UOI (1985)- In Brief

March 1, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of press series The case of ‘Express Newspaper Private limited v. UOI (1985)’ is a landmark case on Freedom of Speech and expression. In this case, Petitions…

Article Tr1

The origin of Parliament’s Right to expunge its members’ remarks

February 26, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series The members of the parliament have many right including the right to speech without any fear of prosecution in the court of law. But,…

Article Case Comments Exclusive A

If Legislature expunges the remarks of a Member, Can Media publish expunged remarks?

February 26, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series Some days ago, during budged session of parliament, we saw many instances where remarks of opposition members were expunged by Speaker and chairman of…

Article Case Comments

Bennett Coleman Co. v. Union of India, (1972)- An Analysis

February 25, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series The case of ‘Bennett Coleman Co. v. Union of India (1972)’ is a landmark case on Press Freedom in India. This case arose when…

Article Case Comments

Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras (1950)- In Brief

February 23, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series The case of ‘Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras, (1950)’ was an important case on the freedom of speech and expression, which came before…

Article Case Comments

Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (1961)- An analysis

February 21, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series The case of ‘Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (1961)’ is considered a landmark case on freedom of press in India. In…

Article

How US Supreme Court shaped the Freedom of Press in India

February 21, 2023

The Lawmatics Freedom of Press Series Art. 19 (1) (a) guarantees to all citizens the right to freedom of speech and expression. it has, however, got to be read along…

Posts pagination

1 … 106 107 108 … 174
Quiz

Do you know?

In which of the following case the Supreme Court declared section 66A of IT Act as unconstitutional?

HTML
Search

"Publish your posts with thelawmatics for wide promotion without any hassel"


Publish Your Post


Recent Posts
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
Recent Experiences
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 9, 2020
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 7, 2020
  • Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    July 3, 2020
Recent Comments
  • Aniruddha on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Virat Sagar on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Google on From Surat Court to Supreme Court- Timeline of Rahul Gandhi’s Case for Stay on Conviction
Archives

All Lists

You missed

Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

Copyright by @ Pfriend862 | TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy for thelawmatics.in
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS
  • Writer’s terms and conditions
  • Writer Registration
  • Contact Us
  • About Us