Skip to content
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Notes
    • Moot References
    • Presentation Database
  • BLOGS
    • Case Comments
    • BOOK REVIEWS
  • Submit Articles
    • Experiences
    • Submission Rules
    • Writer Registration
    • Tip the Writer
      • Write With “Thelawmatics”
  • Services
    • Contact Us
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Activities
      • The_Lawmatics Events
      • WEBINAR
        • FORENSIC SCIENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
      • PM CARES Fund
      • Polls
        • Student’s Opinion
      • Gallery
    • Law Entrance at Panjab University, Chandigarh
    • LLB Previous Year Papers.
    • Immigration
    • Alumni/Student Registration
    • Quiz

Latest Post

What was Mandal Report? Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors. A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post

Circumstantial evidence & The last-seen theory are crucial aspects of Criminal Jurisprudence, Supreme Court: Detailed Analysis of Judgment in Raja Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh

February 9, 2025
Article Exclusive A Post Top Post Tr1

Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC- Law Points in Brief

February 8, 2025
Post

What was Mandal Report?

November 11, 2025
Article Post

Section 307 IPC, Arms Act and the Burden of Proof: Judicial Scrutiny in State v. Gian & Ors.

October 13, 2025
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1

A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street

October 7, 2025
Post

Rule of Limitations- General Policy of the law of limitation is to favour the use of legal diligence

September 21, 2025
Post

Vertical and Horizontal Reservation- Difference

September 5, 2025
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Trending
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Article
Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Article
Simplifying the UN Charter- Part I- Purposes and Principles of United Nation
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Article Opinion
Maharashtra Gag Order to curb the spread of fake news
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
Experience
Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
Article
JURISPENDENTIAL ASPECT OF OWNERSHIP
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Article Exclusive A Opinion Post Tr1
A Shoe at the Bench: Warning Signs from India’s Turbulent Street
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Article Opinion Tr1
Clipping the Wings of Drones? A Legal Look at India’s 2025 Drone Bill
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Article Post Top Post Tr1
Ashburner’s Principles of Equity
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
Article Post Tr1
Grace or Injustice? The Supreme Court to Decide Fate of NEET 2024 Grace Marks
Article

Law relating to gaming and wagering contracts

December 6, 2023

Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, reads as follows: “The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless, it is forbidden by law, or the Court regards it…

Post

What Supreme Court said on Article 14 in E P Royappa Case?

December 5, 2023

Equality is a dynamic concept with many aspects and dimensions and it cannot be “cribbed cabined and confined” within traditional and doctrinaire limits. From a positivistic point of view, equality…

Post

Anti-Suit Injunctions- Explained

December 3, 2023

Anti-Suit Injunctions are meant to restrain a party to a suit/proceeding from instituting or prosecuting a case in another court, including a foreign court. Simply put, an anti-suit injunction is…

Case Comments

Deepak Sibbal v. Panjab University (1989)- An Analysis

December 2, 2023

The case of ‘Deepak Sibbal v. Panjab University (1989)’ is an important case under Article 14 of Indian Constitution. Facts of the Case “Admission to evening classes is open only…

Post

What does Socialist Republic mean? – Explained by Supreme Court

November 30, 2023

The Supreme Court in the case of ‘D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (1982)’, while deciding the question of pension, discussed the concept of Socialism as follows- What does a…

Article

What is pension and why pension is needed in welfare state?

November 30, 2023

“When you gave your best in the hey-day of life to your employer, in days of invalidity, economic security by way of periodical payment is assured.” The antiquated notion of…

Case Comments

D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (1982) – An analysis

November 30, 2023

The case of ‘D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (1982)’, is a landmark case on right to equality in India. The case arose when government issued a notification laying down…

Post

Injunctions from instituting any suit under Specific Performance Act, 1963

November 29, 2023

Part III of the Specific Performance Act, 1963 bears the heading ‘Preventive Relief’ and fasciculus of sections therein included provide for injunctions generally. Sec. 36 provides that preventive relief is…

Article

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Case – When the importance of Caste Census appeared before the Supreme Court

November 26, 2023

The ‘Caste Census’ is a hot topic in India nowadays. The issue was first raised this year by Indian National Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in a Speech at Kolar Karnataka…

Case Comments

Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008) – A Brief Analysis

November 26, 2023

The case of Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2006) is an important case related to reservation in India. The case arose when a writ petition was filed challenging…

Posts pagination

1 … 76 77 78 … 174
Quiz

Do you know?

In which of the following case the Supreme Court declared section 66A of IT Act as unconstitutional?

HTML
Search

"Publish your posts with thelawmatics for wide promotion without any hassel"


Publish Your Post


Recent Posts
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
  • Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    Whether the ‘provision’ in Article 16(4) must necessarily be made by the Parliament? Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

    December 24, 2025
Recent Experiences
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 9, 2020
  • Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    Admission Experience: Ll.b in Panjab University Chandigarh

    July 7, 2020
  • Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    Admission Experience: B.A LL.B in PU Regional center Ludhiana

    July 3, 2020
Recent Comments
  • Aniruddha on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Virat Sagar on Paid Menstrual Leave: A Boon or a Bane?  
  • Google on From Surat Court to Supreme Court- Timeline of Rahul Gandhi’s Case for Stay on Conviction
Archives

All Lists

You missed

Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the very concept of reservations?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether Article 16(4) is exhaustive of the concept of reservations in favour of backward classes?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether clause (4) of Article 16 is an exception to clause (1)?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
Article

Whether an executive order making a ‘provision’ under Article 16(4) is enforceable forthwith?: Justice R.M. Sahai in Indira Sawhney (1992)

December 24, 2025
TheLawmatics

TheLawmatics

Copyright by @ Pfriend862 | TheLawmatics

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy for thelawmatics.in
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS
  • Writer’s terms and conditions
  • Writer Registration
  • Contact Us
  • About Us