Same-Sex Marriage -What Justice DY Chandrachud said about the institution of Marriage?
“Age, health and a variety of circumstances may bear on the decision of a heterosexual couple to bear or not to bear children. The inability of queer couples to procreate…
Queerness is not urban or elite idea- Analysis of Justice DY Chandrachud on the idea of queerness in India
“Progress has perhaps been inconsistent, non-linear, and at a less than ideal pace but progress there has been. We must recognize the vital role of Indian society in contributing to…
The Powers and limitations of Supreme Court to issue writs and directions under Article 32- An Analysis
Article 32 vests Supreme Court with the power to enforce the rights in Part III (Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution. Part III of the Constitution of India enshrines the fundamental…
The Essentials of Section 125 CrPC
The Indian legal system is a complex web of statutes and regulations, each designed to uphold justice and protect the rights of citizens. Among the myriad provisions of the Code…
What were the prayers of the Petitioners in the Same-Sex Marriage Case?
On 17th October, the Indian Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment on the question of recognition of Same Sex Marriage. The Indian Supreme Court refused to recognize the same sex…
Same-Sex Marriage Case- Submissions of Lawyers against the Petitioners
On 17th October, the Indian Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment on the question of recognition of Same Sex Marriage. The Indian Supreme Court refused to recognize the same sex…
Submissions of All Lawyers on Petitioners Side in Same-Sex Marriage Case
On 17th October, the Indian Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment on the recognition of Same Sex Marriage. The Indian Supreme Court refused to recognize the same sex marriage. There…
Marriage Equality Case- What Justice DY Chandrachud said about discrimination faced by LGBTQ
On 17th October, the Indian Supreme Court delivered a historic judgment on the recognition of Same Sex Marriage. The Indian Supreme Court refused to recognize the same sex marriage. There…
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)- In Brief
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 criminalizes “carnal intercourse against the order of nature.” History is replete with instances of the State having used the provision to rip-off…
The burden on the Detaining authority to comply with the rules of detention
The power of preventive detention is a draconian power justified only in the interest of public security and order and it is tolerated in a free society only as a…