The Supreme Court in Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta, (1994) considered the statute in detail and answered the question as follows: The provisions of the Act thus have to…
In Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta, (1994) It was urged before the court that the applicability of the Act having been confined to moveable goods only a complaint filed…
Section 5 of the Limitation Act, reads as under: – “5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.— Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of…
Section 5 of the Limitation Act, reads as under: – “5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.— Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of…
Section 5 of the Limitation Act, reads as under: – “5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.— Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of…
Section 5 of the Limitation Act, reads as under: – “5. Extension of prescribed period in certain cases.— Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of…
In R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab the Constitution Bench of Supreme Court considered the question of appointment and promotion and roster points vis-a-vis reservation and held thus: (SCC p.…
In Anil Kumar Gupta and others v. State of U.P. and others (1995) 5 SCC 173, a bench of two Judges of Supreme Court explained the concept of overall reservation…
The supreme Court first clarified the concept of Vertical and Horizontal Reservation in the case of Indra Sawhney and Others v. Union of India and others (1992) Supp (3) SCC…
This is an excerpt from the judgment State of Karnataka v. Puttaraja. The law regulates social interests, arbitrates conflicting claims and demands. Security of persons and property of the people…
