Evidentiary Value of Historical Facts And Gazetteer
Punjab Chief Court in Farzand Ali v Zafar Ali analysed this. In that case, there was a dispute between the Mutawalli of a mosque and the defendants, who were descendants…
Punjab Chief Court in Farzand Ali v Zafar Ali analysed this. In that case, there was a dispute between the Mutawalli of a mosque and the defendants, who were descendants…
Preponderance of Probabilities in Civil Law The court in a civil trial applies a standard of proof governed by a preponderance of probabilities. This standard is also described sometimes as…
The Suit of 1885 was instituted by Mahant Raghubar Das, describing himself as “Mahant Janamsthan situated at Ayodhya”. The suit was initially instituted only against the Secretary of State for…
In Bishwanath v Sri Thakur Radha Ballabhji Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether a worshipper can maintain a suit for eviction on behalf of the idol if the shebait…
In Rai Sahib Dr Gurdittamal Kapur v Mahant Amar Das Chela Mahant Ram Saran, Supreme Court dealt with a case where a suit was filed in 1957 by the first…
The law of limitation is embodied in a statute which is based on the principles of repose or peace, as held by Supreme Court in Pundlik Jalam Patil v Executive…
Whether a de facto shebait can claim a right to continue indefinitely in office. A de jure shebait and a de facto shebait exercise similar rights in the limited sense…
The rights of a de facto shebait to institute suits on behalf of the deity can be traced to two early decisions of the Privy Council: Mahant Ram Charan Das…
The question of who can sue on behalf of the idol arises due to the unique nature of the idol. The idol is a juristic person and the owner of…
An idol is a juristic person in which title to the endowed property vests. The idol does not enjoy possession of the property in the same manner as do natural…