Are Relatives ‘Interested Evidence’?
In criminal cases, it is often the case that the offence is witnessed by a close relative of the victim, whose presence on the scene of the offence would be…
In criminal cases, it is often the case that the offence is witnessed by a close relative of the victim, whose presence on the scene of the offence would be…
Merely because the witnesses turn hostile does not necessarily mean that their evidence has to be thrown out entirely and what is supportive of the prosecution certainly be used. In…
With the development of law, the theory of last seen has become a definite tool in the hands of the prosecution to establish the guilt of the accused. This concept…
The golden thread which runs through the web of administration of justice in criminal cases is that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case, one…
Hazard in accepting the opinion It has occasionally been said on very high authority that it would be hazardous to base a conviction solely on the opinion of a handwriting…
The English decisions in Duncan v. Cammell Laird & Co; Conway v. Rimmer & Anr.; and Rogers v. Home Secretary surveyed the earlier law on the rule of exclusion of…
Identification Tests do not constitute substantive evidence As was observed by Supreme Court in Matru v. State of U.P. (1971 (2) SCC 75) identification tests do not constitute substantive evidence.…
Punjab Chief Court in Farzand Ali v Zafar Ali analysed this. In that case, there was a dispute between the Mutawalli of a mosque and the defendants, who were descendants…
Preponderance of Probabilities in Civil Law The court in a civil trial applies a standard of proof governed by a preponderance of probabilities. This standard is also described sometimes as…
The legal position with respect to the sufficiency of the circumstantial evidence for sustaining criminal conviction is well settled. The circumstances established on the record according to the law of…