The case of ‘Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999)’, is a landmark case. It is an important case not only as regard to interpretation rule but also to…
Negligence as a tort is the breach of a duty caused by omission to do something which a reasonable man would do or doing something which a prudent and reasonable…
A writ petition was filed under Article 32, by an organisation dedicated to the welfare of inter-state migrants, requesting the court to issue direction to curb the evil practice of…
Hate speech is an effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a group. Using expression that exposes the group to hatred, hate speech seeks to delegitimise group members…
`Mimansa Rules of Interpretation’ `Mimansa Rules of Interpretation’ is a traditional principle of interpretation. In the case of ‘Rjabir singh dalal v. Chaudhry devi lal university, (2008)’, Justice markandey Katju…
The decision of a Court is a precedent if it lays down some principle of law supported by reasons. Mere casual observations or directions without laying down any principle of…
It would be quite contrary to the concept of personal liberty enshrined in the Constitution that any person should be punished in respect of any matter, upon which, he has…
What are Khap panchayats? The parallel law enforcement agency consists of leading men of a group having the same lineage or caste which quite often meets to deal with the…
Honour killing guillotines individual liberty, freedom of choice and one’s own perception of choice. It has to be sublimely borne in mind that when two adults consensually choose each other…
Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999)- Complete Analysis
The case of ‘Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999)’, is a landmark case. It is an important case not only as regard to interpretation rule but also to…
Medical Negligence- Breach of duty in Medical Profession
Negligence as a tort is the breach of a duty caused by omission to do something which a reasonable man would do or doing something which a prudent and reasonable…
Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India, (2014)- A case against hate speech
A writ petition was filed under Article 32, by an organisation dedicated to the welfare of inter-state migrants, requesting the court to issue direction to curb the evil practice of…
Meaning of Hate Speech under law and Indian Legal Framework to curb it
Hate speech is an effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a group. Using expression that exposes the group to hatred, hate speech seeks to delegitimise group members…
Mimansa Rules of Interpretation
`Mimansa Rules of Interpretation’ `Mimansa Rules of Interpretation’ is a traditional principle of interpretation. In the case of ‘Rjabir singh dalal v. Chaudhry devi lal university, (2008)’, Justice markandey Katju…
What constitutes Precedents?
The decision of a Court is a precedent if it lays down some principle of law supported by reasons. Mere casual observations or directions without laying down any principle of…
Bail- Origin, Philosophy, Object and Principles
Just as liberty is precious to an individual, so is the society's interest in maintenance of peace, law and order. Both are equally important.
Why Bail is given? – Jurisprudence behind it
It would be quite contrary to the concept of personal liberty enshrined in the Constitution that any person should be punished in respect of any matter, upon which, he has…
The Supreme Court’s view on Khap Panchayats
What are Khap panchayats? The parallel law enforcement agency consists of leading men of a group having the same lineage or caste which quite often meets to deal with the…
Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (2018)- A Case on Honour Killing
Honour killing guillotines individual liberty, freedom of choice and one’s own perception of choice. It has to be sublimely borne in mind that when two adults consensually choose each other…