Admissions may operate as estoppel and they do so where parties had agreed to abide by them. The word ‘information’ occurring in s.20 is not to be understood in the…
The question came before the court in the case of ‘Naresh Shridhar Mirjakar v. State of Maharashtra (1966). Facts of the Case Facts of the case, are that, …
The Supreme Court of India considered this question thoroughly in the case of ‘Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujrat (1983)’. In this case, a public servant tried to…
If there is concurrent finding of facts by lower court and High court in a case, the Supreme Court considers the reappraisal or reappreciation of case in following circumstances- (1)…
Sexual violence apart from being a dehumanizing act is an unlawful intrusion on the right of privacy and sanctity of a female. It is a serious blow to her supreme…
Section 172 of the criminal procedure code makes the provision of case diary. Section 172 of the Code which Section reads thus: 172. Diary of proceedings in investigation.- (1) Every…
The right of an accused to cross-examine a witness Under Evidence Act Section 145 of the Evidence Act provides:- A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by…
Section 30 of the Evidence Act, 1872, provides that when more persons than one are being tried jointly for the same offence, and a confession made by one of such…
The case of ‘Queen Empress v. Abdullah (1885), is a very important case in Evidence law. It was Allahabad High Court’s case and the bench was CJ. W C Petheram,…
When an offence is committed and investigation starts, the police have two objects in view. The first is the collection of information, and the second is the finding of the…
